Thursday, January 20, 2011

The Social Policy of Paleoconservatives

 Discrimination and preference are needed to combat indifference and promiscuity. The social revolution of the counterculture is manifest by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- that prohibits freedom of association in the public and private sector. Many will rationalyze this and claim that it was actually inhumane that a negro couldn't eat at a diner that didn't want their business, and vice-versa. Or a company with more then five employees has to hire a quota. This is about more then racial discrimination, its regarding religious and political affiliation as well. If i was renting an apartment or room: i could not specify that i do not want Catholics, Jews, homosexuals or whomever renting from me. If i do not want to associate for whatever reason as a business or not: i can be sued, jailed, fined, closed and forced to associate with that wich Government policy wants made inclusive. One argument is that Government should not sanction segregation... nor prohibit. When it did the black portion was underfunded and/or the negro establishment mismanaged their funds; but governing requires laws to enforce a community standard. Of wich is based on majority consent, yet still providing for the rights of the minority. In certain southern locales citizens were followed and harassed that wanted to intermingle in a cross-racial manner. Also, claiming one is to lose their seat for a white -- when a bus is crowded -- is subjegation, not merely segregated seating.
 Liberty requires individual autonomy, including a racial and cultural context. Autonomy's sovereign individual takes presidence over racial affiliation as our culture suggests -- to an extent. Yet such a character and its social construct is founded upon whites--specifically white Protestants. A paleoconservative social policy should be a sound resistence to socialism's social policy. A paleoconservative should assert freedom of association by associating with whomever he wants and not associating with those he does not want to associate with -- defying prevailing social norms of various amalgamation. Counterculture guru, socialist saint and one-world martyr Martin Luther King Jr. spoke of 'judging' an individual based on character not 'color of skin'. The cognitive absense of such a statement relies on emotional connotation. Hate is a connotative term for opposition, used by those that do not oppose, or had only opposed us...'bigots'. Bigotry is no vice but a virtue; as we understand that character is not absent from one's race, creed, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, political preference and even cultural affiliation.

© Common Law copyright: If sharing then only a link is permissable. Do not use, borrow or share otherwise.

1 Comments:

At February 26, 2011 at 4:03 AM , Blogger Mr. Mcgranor said...

Thankyou... The article relates in libertarian terms that: freedom of association and a right to exclusion -- are needed to preserve autonomy. Further commentating regarding the countercultures social revolution--insynch with the legislation.
While our politics are fringe and our character marginal; we are a culture without a system...never-the-less.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home