A Paleoconservative View of the Mid-East
Purged or changing course -- the new world order hangs in the balance of the Mid-east. May the inhabitants of their respective culture and tradition assert their autonomy, and perhaps even mold a hegemony that one-worlders may find concerning. The West did not preserve their culture and its traditions. Yet Western society wants to interfere with another culture to achieve stability for their fallen own? Is this the doings of neoconservatives, commies, Evangelical and Jewish groups behind the scenes?
Society is without a...
1. Law -- unless it is some never ending statute law.
2. System -- unless it is a bankrupt Capitalist/Free-enterprise system...That seeks to bankrupt globally. Due to certain trade practises and credit.
3. Faith -- unless it is Israel. (or the ecumenical hope of 'coming home' to a supposed mother church)
The saught Caliphate: that is a Shi'ite precept--is the equivalent of the Evangelicals saught return of Christ within the rapture theory. In regards to the potential conflict. Though the terrorist groups mentioned in the news are behind the scenes of the upheaval, are a threat to us. They acting on behalf of their societies, and the societies themselves, understand us to be a threat as well. No matter how neoconservatives attempt to define the mid-east; the mid-easterner is not Western man. As a consequence: they seek to preserve their system and culture by opposing those against the preservation of their system and culture. When Western critics use the phrase radical Islam or Muslim extremist--it is one that connotates the West's inablity to apply a faith they lost to the secular, which in other words means 'moderate'. Do you think a faith lasts--or is relevant, when it is not wholly practiced? So the West popularly calls for the dismantling of the Mohammedans faith--as it is upstaging theirs for a lack of one. Broadly Western Man would like to preserve a culture and system dead by its very nihilism and postmodern fancy. Even though Europes own ideology and forfeiting of their culture and system -- for a notion of equality -- had lead to the immigration and cultural infringement taking place.
In the United States of America -- we Americans know better and we also are not connected or close to the geographic area of the Middle East.
I urge you to understand that there is a cultural contrast between traditional (marginal-reactionary) American culture and certain aspects of the Mid-East. There is also commonality--as in whom is the only other culture opposing globalization? A void is left by such a contrast. What is going to fill that void? When a paleoconservative is just as vehement in opposing actual Mohammedans--whom the neoconservatives call radical. Wanting a secular abyss to enfold the world for nihilistic freedom is the goal of the neoconservatives and even Libertarians. We paleoconservatives do not want an influx of Mohammedans, for the same reason those who were Protestant did not want Papists here--imposing their Government and its religion. Only that the Mohammedans are not going to be magically converted; or eventually wind-down to secular or moderate standards. But alas we are part of a cultural strain with no true place in the system: This is a Masonic nation. Not fully seen until its Christian culture died ( Protestant). Now do not expect as a Catholic to fill the void. You have been hiding and suppressed too long(write off the anglo world because of this).
Having stated what i have stated -- the conclusion could only be -- who has the upperhand? ...Unless a drastic change in policy takes place.
© Common Law copyright: If sharing then only a link is permissable. Do not use, borrow or share otherwise.